Background#
Testing whether locally-hosted, open-source models are good enough to take a customer-service conversation — after it’s been converted from speech to text — and produce a usable summary. All of this ran on consumer-grade GPU hardware, since that’s what’s actually practical for a setup like this.
Models tested#
Ten models pulled via Ollama:
| Model | Size |
|---|---|
llama3:70b | 39 GB |
llama3:latest | 4.7 GB |
deepseek-v2:latest | 8.9 GB |
llama3-groq-tool-use:latest | 4.7 GB |
wangshenzhi/gemma2-9b-chinese-chat:latest | 5.8 GB |
glm4:9b | 5.5 GB |
gemma2:latest | 5.4 GB |
gemma2:27b | 15 GB |
qwen2:72b | 41 GB |
qwen2:7b | 4.4 GB |
Evaluation approach#
Each model was scored across three dimensions: how accurately it captured the customer’s underlying intent, how well it documented the steps the agent actually took, and how precisely it identified the core issue. Scores were gathered from a mix of perspectives — customer-service staff, ML practitioners, and end users — and averaged into a final result.

